ROUNDABOUT BLOG

Long Day’s Journey Into Night

 

Gabriel Byrne and Jessica Lange in Long Day's Journey into Night. Photo by Joan Marcus.

Gabriel Byrne and Jessica Lange in LONG DAY'S JOURNEY INTO NIGHT. (Photo by Joan Marcus)

 

On April 16, 2016, Rob Richter spoke about Long Day’s Journey into Night with education dramaturg Ted Sod as part of Roundabout Theatre Company’s lecture series.

An edited transcript follows:

Ted Sod: Rob, I wanted to start with some background information on how you got interested in Eugene O'Neill and his family.

Rob Richter: My first introduction to O'Neill was really as a teenager living in Westchester County. I would come into New York and see productions. I saw Liv Ullmann play the title role in Anna Christie; I saw Jason Robards perform in A Touch of the Poet. My father, who was a journalist, at one time thought he might be a theater critic and he loved O'Neill, so he gave me a paperback of O'Neill's seven one-act sea plays when I was studying theater as an undergraduate. I went to school at Connecticut College, New London, Connecticut, where Long Day’s Journey into Night is set. It's funny, during those school years I don’t really remember making a connection or going to the house or anything.

Fast forward a number of years and I was working at Mystic Seaport Museum, the maritime museum, in 1988, which was the centennial of Eugene O'Neill's birth, and naturally there was a lot of programming going on around O'Neill, and I was asked if I'd direct some of his sea plays at the museum. I chose Bound East for Cardiff, which is set in the crew quarters of a ship. And we did it in the crew quarters of a ship. I directed The Long Voyage Home, which is set in a sailors’ tavern, and we did it in a tavern. As I was reading those plays again, now with a background in maritime history, I thought, this guy knows what he's talking about. What I think theater practitioners would see as jargon, was hardcore detailed information.

Eugene O'Neill

Eugene O'Neill

I then became fascinated with how O'Neill came to know this information about the maritime world and be so detailed in his plays. I started work on a master's degree at Wesleyan University in American Studies and I decided my thesis would be the maritime influence on Eugene O'Neill.

And when you think about O'Neill's plays -- there are about 45 plays he authorized for publication and 20 or so of those deal in some way with sailors and the sea. Even in Long Day's Journey Into Night there is a monologue that the character Edmund has, in which he has a very strong connection with the sea.
After finishing my thesis, I thought I'd write a book. And so I started another year of research and writing and then I published Eugene O'Neill and Dat Ole Devil Sea. It's a title that just rolls off your tongue.

TS: What can you tell us about the Monte Cristo Cottage which is the setting for the play, Long Day’s Journey into Night?

RR: The Monte Cristo Cottage is in New London, Connecticut. It is right across the street from the Thames River and has a view of the harbor.

It was a house that James O'Neill cobbled together in a sense. It was originally used as a store on the first floor with living apartments on the second floor. And on the property there was also a one-room schoolhouse that he had moved and abutted to the main structure of the house. The action in the play actually takes place in that room, which was the schoolhouse.

The Monte Cristo Cottage

The Monte Cristo Cottage

In order to make it grand, James O'Neill had the ceilings raised on the first floor. And there are lots of windows. But on the second floor, he didn’t raise the roof so the living quarters are claustrophobic and cramped.

And if you read the stage directions in Long Day's Journey Into Night – O'Neill's stage directions are very detailed in all of his plays – he talks about the movement of the sun. The house faces the east, so it gets the morning sun. But there are really no windows on the back or west side of the house, so come midday it starts to go into shadow and by early evening, when it's still light outside, it's a very dark place.

TS: You mentioned Bound East for Cardiff earlier, which was really the first play of O’Neill’s to be produced – correct?

RR: It was produced 100 years ago in 1916 in Provincetown. And that play is really thought to be the beginning of a new American theater, a theater of realism. Prior to that, there was much more melodrama being produced. When I work with students today they think, what's the big deal with O'Neill? This type of theater and this realism is what we're just so familiar with nowadays. But he was really revolutionary and Bound East for Cardiff was the beginning.

TS: He was influenced by Chekhov, Ibsen and Strindberg. In fact, the Swedes adored him as I understand it?

RR: Chekhov, Strindberg and Ibsen were huge. A man by the name of Doc Gainey, who was very well traveled internationally, picked up that dramatic literature overseas and brought back with him. He shared that literature with O'Neill. That was O'Neill's first exposure to it. There was a group of young men, O'Neill and his contemporaries that was called the Second Story Club. They would gather at Doc Gainey's house on Main Street in New London, which is now Eugene O'Neill Drive; and they would play cards and smoke cigars, drink and talk. It was during these visits that O'Neill borrowed the literature.

TS: Can we talk about the 1920s for O'Neill and his family? I suppose we should explain that the character of Edmund in the play this afternoon is an avatar or stand-in for Eugene. But there was a brother named Edmund. Would you like to explicate that for us?

RR: Yes. Eugene had two brothers. Eugene was born in 1888. Jamie or James, Jr., was born 10 years earlier in 1878. And another brother, Edmund, was born in 1883. He died before Eugene was born. He died from the measles that he was exposed to from Jamie. Jamie had measles and he was told to stay away from the baby. Apparently he didn’t. Ella, his mother, and James, Sr. were on tour at this point, so their grandmother, Ella’s mother, was taking care of the children.

TS: In the play, O’Neill keeps the names for his father and brother the same and he uses his mother's first name – her name was Mary Ella in fact.

RR: Mary Ellen was her name.

TS: But they referred to her as Ella?

RR: Yes, yes.

TS: His father, who was a matinee idol, made an incredible amount of money for that time period touring in The Count of Monte Cristo, which is why the home was named after it. I read somewhere he was making about $40,000 a year.

RR: He was making a huge amount. He owned the rights to the script. He tried to step away from Monte Cristo, but audiences kept wanting him to come back to it. He performed in three or four Broadway productions of The Count of Monte Cristo. It was a great vehicle for him.

Jessica Lange as Mary Tyrone in Long Day's Journey into Night

Jessica Lange as Mary Tyrone in Long Day's Journey into Night

TS: He passed away in 1920?

RR: Right and it's an interesting time. It's a very poignant time in O'Neill's life because he is beginning to make it as a playwright. At this point, he's living in Provincetown. He's doing a lot of writing. Beyond the Horizon, which was his first full-length play, had just opened on Broadway in 1920. So that, in his father's world, would certainly be a sign of success. And then James fell ill and in 1920 he passed away. Mary Ellen passed away in 1922.

One thing that I'd like to point out is that Long Day’s Journey into Night is a moment in time in his life. And, at that time, his mother was addicted to morphine. She beat that. I think because the play is so well known there's not always the revelation that she beat it and had a successful life. After her husband died, she managed the real estate and did very well. And Jamie O'Neill, his older brother, who had been an alcoholic, dies in 1923. After the father died, he was on the wagon and was really a companion for his mother. But when she died, Jamie fell off the wagon, severely, and he basically drank himself to death.

So O’Neill is this acclaimed, emerging playwright on Broadway who wins a Pulitzer Prize for Beyond the Horizon and then for Anna Christie and he's losing all of his immediate family.

TS: He wins a third Pulitzer Prize for Strange Interlude the same decade, so his success is rather phenomenal throughout the '20s. He strikes up a collaboration with Paul Robeson and writes three plays for a leading black actor, which was unheard of at the time – do you agree?

RR: It was unheard of. In his play All God's Chillun God Wings, was the first interracial kiss in the American theatre. In his play, The Emperor Jones, which came first, it was the first mixed race cast. The character of the Emperor Jones was first played by Charles Gilpin, an African-American. The producing company had wanted to do it in blackface but O'Neill refused. So Gilpin was the first black actor playing with a white theater company.

Paul Robeson replaced Gilpin in the title role in the play and film and then went on to perform in All God’s Chillun. The Klu Klux Klan threatened the production of All God's Chillun, at various points, threatening O’Neill. His play Desire Under the Elms had to be performed in court before the censors, before it was allowed to open in Los Angeles. He was pushing the envelope for the American theater, American culture.

TS: He really wanted theater to say something, as opposed to being escapist or innocuous entertainment.

RR: He was really trying to talk about issues. For American literature and American drama, he was setting the trend. There were other movements and other art forms in terms of realism in the visual arts. He was part of that whole group of artists in Greenwich Village who were part of the Ashcan School, such as George Bellows, who was painting dock workers.

TS: I want to get to Ah, Wilderness!, which was written in the '30s I believe. He wrote it specifically so he could prove he could write a comedy, because his métier was tragedy. That play takes place in the same location, the Monte Cristo Cottage. Is he the stand-in for the main character?

RR: The main character of Richard in Ah, Wilderness!, which is also set in the Monte Cristo Cottage -- but they don’t refer to it as that -- is part of a much larger family. Richard is a really idealistic teenager who has been exposed to the avant-garde literature of Oscar Wilde and Swinburne and he has these revolutionary ideas, but he is also very naïve. Yes, there's parallels between O'Neill himself and Richard. But the father in Ah, Wilderness! is a newspaper editor.

There were two prominent newspaper families in New London. Judge Latimer was the editor of The New London Telegraph, and the McGinley family was involved with The New London Day, which still exists. O'Neill was friends with the McGinley family. It was a very large family. Judge Latimer from The Telegraph was a mentor to him as well. And so the character of the father is Latimer, but the family is probably the McGinleys.

TS: So it's literally a hybrid of people he knew and somewhat less autobiographical?

RR: It is definitely a hybrid. O'Neill talked about how it was the family that he wished he had been born into. When it opened on Broadway, the theater world was in shock because they were used to all of his dark dramas. All of a sudden he comes out with Ah, Wilderness!, this bittersweet comedy.

TS: In the late '30s O'Neill wanted to write an 11-play cycle about a family from the 1800s to modern times. Only two pieces survive because he abandoned the project and he told his third wife, Carlotta Monterey, to destroy everything. What survived was A Touch of the Poet and More Stately Mansions.

RR: A draft of More Stately Mansions, yes.

TS: When he abandoned that project he started on the more autobiographical plays like Long Day’s Journey, Moon for the Misbegotten and The Iceman Cometh.

RR: Right, and Iceman came first, then Long Day's Journey into Night, and then Moon for the Misbegotten.

Colby Minifie in Long Day's Journey into Night

Colby Minifie in LONG DAY'S JOURNEY INTO NIGHT. (Photo by Joan Marcus)

TS: Now he finished Long Day's Journey in '41, and puts it in an envelope. He hands it to Carlotta as an anniversary present, and says, "I don’t want this published or produced until 25 years after my death." So, is this a first draft?

RR: I would say that O'Neill would probably say it is a draft. I wouldn't say it's a first draft. He worked on it but he didn’t consider a play complete until it went through a rehearsal process and then he made revisions during that process. He gave the play to Carlotta, but he also had given the play to Random House, his publisher. And he told Random House, "Put it in the safe, lock it away, I do not want this published until 25 years after my death. And I do not want it ever produced."

TS: What is the reasoning behind that – was it because of his children? He disinherited -- or really didn’t care for his children.

RR: He had a very strong relationship with Eugene Junior. Eugene Junior was part of his first marriage with Kathleen Jenkins. And that marriage and that birth took place prior to the events in Long Day's Journey into Night. So I'll leave it there.

TS: But can we tell them what happened to Eugene Junior? He ultimately committed suicide?

RR: Right, he committed suicide in 1950. And O’Neill passed away in '53. So Carlotta felt she was in charge of the estate so she had the power to take the script from Random House. She gave it to Yale to publish, and authorized production. First in Sweden and then here in the US. She said that since Eugene Junior was no longer living there were no other relatives that it would impact. But Oona was still alive, and Shane was still alive.

TS: Shane also committed suicide -- correct?

RR: Yes, he did. He was plagued by addiction.
RR: Oona married Charlie Chaplin when Chaplin was 54 and she was 18. He had both Oona and Shane with his second wife, Agnes Bolton.

TS: And was that really the reason that O’Neill never saw her again?

RR: There was a paternity suit against Chaplin at the time. So there's good reason for O’Neill not to want his 18-year-old daughter to be hanging out with Charlie Chaplin. But Charlie and Oona had a great life.

TS: And marvelous children.

RR: And children.

TS: I saw Victoria Chaplin, their daughter, do a circus piece in Seattle and it was just brilliant. She inherited her father's physical prowess. So Carlotta decides that she's going to transfer the play to Yale and she creates a scholarship for playwrights. From the royalties?

RR: Right.

TS: And then she makes the Broadway production happen with Jose Quintero directing?

RR: Yes. Jose Quintero had directed a revival of The Iceman Cometh. The first production bombed, and then the revival was very successful. That also pushed Carlotta to say, "You know I have this piece that no one knows about." And so she summoned Jose and said, "I want you to do this play."

TS: Did he direct the revival of The Iceman Cometh during O'Neill's lifetime?

RR: No, O'Neill had passed away. If Carlotta had not released Long Day's Journey into Night, O'Neill and his work might have gone into obscurity.

TS: Because we would not have gotten to read this play until 1978?

RR: Right.

TS: The play wins the Pulitzer posthumously. The first Broadway production is in 1956 with Fredric March and his real-life wife, Florence Eldridge.

RR: And Jason Robards is Jamie.

TS: Bradford Dillman is Edmund I believe. And we always forget the names of the maids.

RR: Right there's the poor maid.

TS: Unforgiveable. Who would like to ask a question?

Audience #1: My question is, I thought that A Moon for the Misbegotten was a continuation of this play. And I just wanted to know the connection between this play and that one?

RR: A Moon for the Misbegotten is Jamie's story after Mary Ellen, the mother, has passed away. It is Eugene trying to come to terms with his brother's death. He's writing this 20 years later, but wrestling with what happened to his brother. Jamie Tyrone or Jim Tyrone is the main character in A Moon for the Misbegotten. And it is also set in that New London community.

John Gallagher, Jr. and Michael Shannon in Long Day's Journey into Night

John Gallagher, Jr. and Michael Shannon in Long Day's Journey into Night

TS: But would it be considered a sequel or prequel to Long Days Journey?

RR: It would be a sequel.

TS: Because it happens after the action of today's play, which is about 1912?

RR: Yes, 1912. The real events of Long Day's Journey into Night happened in December of 1912. O'Neill sets the action of the play in August of 1912.

TS: And the idea that's addressed in the play is about Edmund, the character based on Eugene O'Neill, being diagnosed with tuberculosis. That really happened?

RR: Yes.

TS: And right after that, correct me if I'm giving misinformation, he was sent to a sanitarium for six months?

RR: Yes. He went to the Gaylord Hospital sanitarium in Connecticut for treatment of his tuberculosis. He was encouraged by Dr. Lyman there to write about things that he knew.

TS: I believe not long after that his father arranged for him to study with George Baker?

RR: Right. Baker was at Harvard and teaching a playwriting course. It's a two-year course, so he took the first year at Harvard.

Audience #2: Was A Moon for the Misbegotten also sequestered by O’Neill like Long Day's Journey?

RR: No, it wasn’t. O'Neill finished A Moon for the Misbegotten right at the end of World War II. And he felt it was too depressing to have this play done at the end of the war when people wanted to see optimistic things. So he was against having it produced. But the Theatre Guild encouraged him and it was produced out of town. One thing I also just want to note is O’Neill is the only American playwright to win the Nobel Prize for literature, and that happened in 1936, prior to writing what we call his great plays.

TS: Long Day’s Journey into Night is often considered to be his magnum opus, his masterpiece. It's usually uttered in the same breath with A Streetcar Named Desire and Death of a Salesman as being one of the greatest American plays ever written. Is there anything else you want to say that we didn’t already discuss?

RR: Long Day’s Journey is a play you should just go along for the ride with. I think it's a great play. The big question for many people is, “How autobiographical is it?” I say it's inspired by O'Neill's life, but he's a playwright and he took license with it.


Long Day's Journey into Night is now playing at The American Airlines Theatre. For tickets and more information, click here.


Related Categories:
2015-2016 Season, A Conversation with, Education @ Roundabout, Long Day's Journey Into Night


No Comments

Follow an Education at Roundabout School Residency

 

“What is life like for an immigrant and their family?”

“What is life like when you feel trapped?”

11th Grade students at Repertory Company High School answered these questions through exploration of Long Day's Journey Into Night and interview theatre techniques to produce an original show for their community. Roundabout Teaching Artist and theatre artist Alan Bounville shares a little about his journey creating this work:

Teaching Artist Alan Bounville with students.

Teaching Artist Alan Bounville with Repertory Company High School students.

This project began when the school’s principal, Mr. Fram, and theatre teacher, Mr. McIntosh, decided to embed the creation of an interview theatre play about immigration into the curriculum for their junior class’ yearlong research project on the subject. The play was to focus on the stories and perspectives of immigrants to the USA. At the onset of the project, each student was asked to interview an immigrant and then transcribe a story from that interview. The overarching research question of the residency was, “How do immigrants to the USA view the term, “American Dream?” The result: dozens of rich and nuanced stories that focused on freedom, family, struggle, opportunity, education and resources. Myriad perspectives on these themes were heard in this play, aptly titled, What is the American Dream?

Producing Partners residencies encourage students and teachers to model professional theatre practice as they work towards producing their own show.  Embedded into this residency was a pre-show workshop and attendance at the student matinee of Long Day’s Journey Into Night. O’Neill’s masterwork related directly to Repertory Company High School’s show. Both pieces have their roots in first person accounts: O’Neill’s is based on his own upbringing and Repertory Company High School’s shares direct accounts from people living today.

In our pre-show workshop, we explored the show’s themes through scene work about immigration and other issues from the script for Long Day’s Journey Into Night (addiction, physical and mental illness, and family discord). Students explored playing the material in ways that didn’t allow for escape. The results were dynamic! Some scene groups confined their work to very specific areas of the room. Some physically blocked their partners in subtle or overt ways. One group put the play’s matriarch, Mary Tyrone, into an imaginary box. As the actor performed, all we saw was her mouth moving as she struggled to escape. Due to this, the other characters’ voices in the scene became disquietingly clear. At the student matinee, the students were rapt with attention (as Jessica Lange recently pointed out in this interview). At intermission and after the show, we discussed the connections between that show and their own. This discussion continued throughout the rest of the residency.

Students in rehearsal for the show

Students in rehearsal

Through a series of several workshops and mentoring sessions, students explored the interview theatre genre by interviewing and transcribing, play editing, and performing. Within the editing process we looked for the overall arc of the show, shifting things around, and editing further until we reached our final script. Students then worked with Roundabout Teaching Artist Creighton Irons to create a musical refrain echoing the show’s title. The refrain was both haunting and interrogating. It paralleled the diversity of experiences and viewpoints about the immigration process that were represented in their play. As we neared the final performance script, we didn’t waste a moment getting the show on its feet. During rehearsals, the students worked in small groups and continued refining the pieces up until opening night. By the residency’s end, Mr. McIntosh and I faded into the background as the students ran the entire show!

Students work on marketing materials for the show.

Students work on marketing materials

The students at Repertory Company High School did one of the most honorable things you can do as an artist: they created something that didn’t exist before. And because they took the time to listen to people’s stories and then create What is the American Dream?, more voices have been heard. At their play’s end, they pose the question: “What is your American Dream?” It is a question that I feel is also embedded deeply in Long Day’s Journey Into Night. It is a question that I will carry with me as I continue my work as an artist and educator. As the artistic director of IN OUR WORDS, a theatre company that uses stories from individuals as the source material for its work, I am immersed daily in and around this genre. I also hold an  MA in Educational Theatre, with a focus on theatre that relates to narratives that parallel those in this project. I am grateful to all of the students and staff at Repertory Company High School and Education at Roundabout for inviting me to be a part of this journey of creation, reflection, and performance.


Related Categories:
Education @ Roundabout, Long Day's Journey Into Night, Teaching Artist Tuesday


No Comments

Interview with Director Jonathan Kent

 

Jonathan Kent

Jonathan Kent

Education dramaturg Ted Sod interviewed Long Day's Journey Into Night director Jonathan Kent about his career and his work on this production so far.

 

Ted Sod: Where were you born and educated? When and why did you decide to direct for the stage?

Jonathan Kent: I was brought up in South Africa, in Cape Town, and had originally thought of becoming a painter. I had never met anyone in theatre and I just felt people in theatre were different from me for some reason. I was very naïve. I got to London and to my surprise got into a drama school and became an actor. I only started directing in 1990 when I took over the Almeida, which, at that time, was a receiving house and not a producing house at all. There was no money, so we went out and raised it. At that point, I was intending really to produce and be an occasional actor.

But, through a set of circumstances I ended up directing the second production - Ibsen’s When We Dead Awaken -- and I remember very clearly directing Claire Bloom on the second day of rehearsal and suddenly thinking, “I don’t care what anybody else thinks, this is what I should be doing.” It brought together so many elements of my life. I’m the son of an architect, the brother of an architect, I was interested in becoming a painter, and I was an actor. And so all these pursuits suddenly came together and made sense of directing, for me. I’ve directed for 26 years now. It’s alarming how quickly time goes by.

 

TS: Did you have any teachers when you were studying acting who were influential?

JK: I was always interested -- sometimes to my detriment as an actor -- in the direction of the play. I was interested in the whole, rather than just my own performance. I didn’t have a teacher per se, but when I left drama school, I went to a repertory company in Scotland called the Glasgow Citizens Theatre. There was a very remarkable stage designer and director there named Philip Prowse. I remember him saying to me, “Why don’t you direct?” It would have saved a lot of time if I had listened to him. On the other hand, I’m glad of my years as an actor. Because, as I’ve said, it feeds into my life as a director.

 

LDJ_200x200TS: Why did you choose to direct Long Day’s Journey into Night?

JK: It’s unanswerably one of the great plays of the 20th century and certainly one of the greatest -- if not the greatest -- American play. The opportunity to direct a play of such emotional complexity, depth, and power would be impossible to turn down. It’s the template for a whole genre of American theatre, the dysfunctional family play. You see so much of this seminal play in other works, and it is fascinating to get back to the source.

 

TS: What kind of preparation will you have to do to direct this?

JK: I’ve read biographies of O’Neill, and I know quite a bit of his work. I produced The Iceman Cometh when I was at the Almeida with Kevin Spacey in the lead. But in the end, it is working with the five actors in a room. It is the exploration of those dysfunctional relationships -- lost in a miasma of addiction and the fog of the drink -- that will be most important. The work lies within, and among, the actors in the rehearsal room.

 

LDJmovieTS: Was watching the film version with Ralph Richardson and Katharine Hepburn of any value?

JK: Yes, it all helps. Laurence Olivier did a production here in London which was very admired. There was the production with Jack Lemmon which I saw on stage and on film with Peter Gallagher and Kevin Spacey playing Edmund and Jamie, respectively. But again, it’s really getting these particular personalities into rehearsal and discovering the specific dynamic among them.

 

TS: Is there any challenge in directing a play that is obviously autobiographical and based on real people?

JK: It is the most overtly autobiographical of all his plays, but in the end it’s fractured through the prism of his genius. He elevates the specific into something much more universal and theatrically potent than just a series of snapshots of a family in New London, Connecticut. It ceases simply to be biography -- it is transmuted into art.

 

TS: What about the Irishness of the play? Is that important to your work in rehearsal?

JK: The Irishness is important, the knowledge of it. It is a constant undertone, but these are first and second generation Americans who have made good in the New World, while still haunted by the myth of Ireland.

 

TS: Why do you think this is such a compelling play for audiences?

JK: It’s a claustrophobic, compulsive portrait of four people in a kind of hell, clinging to the edge of the world over the course of a single day. It has the inexorable drive of great tragedy. There is the additional element of Edmund, who, while part of the family, in the end is going to go on and write about them. That is going to be his exorcism and, ironically, what will also preserve them forever.

 

TS: How will the play manifest itself visually? How are you collaborating with your design team?

JK: This play exists in heightened naturalism. And I think it’s important that one gets the sense of never letting the four of them off the hook. What I think would be a mistake is end-stopping scenes. The whole play is dictated by the relentless movement of the sun over the course of a day. They’re four people clinging to a raft of a house in New London. And the next day it will all begin again, in some way or another. I want to visually allow that. Though it will be specific one also has to allow the universal.

 

TS: Are you planning to use original music?

JK: No, I’m going to use natural sound -- of the sea, perhaps, and the wind. And maybe music or voices borne on the wind.

 

TS: How do you keep yourself inspired as an artist?

JK: I direct three Chekhov plays on stage later this season at the National. So I’ll do Eugene O’Neill followed by three Chekhovs -- how can you not be inspired? To be able to direct a Puccini opera and Gypsy, and then Eugene O’Neill and Chekhov all in the last 18 months is an exhilarating privilege.

 

TS: Do you have any advice for a young person who might want to direct?

JK: I think everybody takes an individual path towards it. It’s a very inexact science, directing. I don’t believe particularly in a formula for directing, in the same way that there isn’t a formula for acting. You do, however, have to submerge your own ego. You start a rehearsal process with power and authority, but during the course of rehearsals, you hand the power across to the actors. So by the end of rehearsal, the actors hold the power of the play. I think that’s an important thing to realize. It’s about allowing the actors to discover it themselves and be even better than they thought they could be.


Long Day's Journey Into Night begins performances April 3 at the American Airlines Theatre. For tickets and information, please visit our website.


Related Categories:
2015-2016 Season, Long Day's Journey Into Night, Upstage


No Comments